|Videos|November 10, 2017

Treating C. difficile: The Downside to Current Approaches

Stuart Johnson, MD, discusses the disadvantages to some of the current approaches used to treat C. difficile.

Stuart Johnson, MD, infectious disease clinician in the Medicine/ID department at Loyola University Medical Center, discusses the disadvantages to some of the current approaches used to treat C. difficile.

Interview Transcript (modified slightly for readability):

“Traditionally, Clostridium difficile infection has been treated with antibiotics that are active against the bacteria; it’s a big of an irony that the disease is typically precipitated by antibiotic treatment meant for, say, urinary tract infection, pneumonia, et. cetera. But the treatment certainly involves classically, antibiotics directed against the organism.

The downside of this, of course, would be that the antibiotics are what got the patient into the situation they’re in, and the treatment, although usually effective for controlling the infection, also have a collateral damage to the flora, the gut that perpetuates this recurrence, if you will.”


Related to this article

Peggy Lillis Foundation Will Honor C diff Advocates at Annual Gala
The Peggy Lillis Foundation will host its 17th Annual Changing the Odds Gala this month in New York City, and it will include a casino, fellowship amongst the C diff community, and an award ceremony honoring a physician-scientist, philanthropist, a researcher, and a patient advocate for their contributions to C difficile awareness, treatment, and prevention.
Ceftriaxone Safety: Separating Signal From Risk
A retrospective multihospital study found that severe adverse events occurred at similarly low rates with ceftriaxone and other IV cephalosporins suggesting there is no evidence to support avoiding ceftriaxone despite recent health department safety alerts.
Treatment of Latent Tuberculosis in a Trice
A retrospective study of 225 patients across Cook County Department of Health clinics found that the novel 1-month 1HP regimen (isoniazid plus rifapentine) for latent TB infection had a completion rate comparable to standard longer regimens and was well tolerated, suggesting it may be a viable shorter alternative.