As mpox cases continue to rise, individuals with HIV are increasingly represented among those affected. While the direct impact of HIV on the likelihood of contracting mpox virus is unclear, it is well-established that people with advanced HIV, particularly those who are immunocompromised, face a higher risk of severe illness and death if they contract mpox. This heightened vulnerability underscores the importance of following prevention strategies, including vaccination, to safeguard health. Understanding how mpox spreads and the available preventive measures is essential for managing this dual health challenge effectively.1
Leo Moore, MD, MSHPM, an internal medicine, HIV medicine, and lifestyle medicine physician based in Los Angeles, California, emphasizes the varying risks for people with HIV. He explains,
“I think about those who are either living with HIV on treatment, have low viral loads or suppressed viral loads, and have strong immune systems, versus those who are not on medication, who have high viral loads and low white blood cell counts. Those patients are at increased risk for severe cases of mpox. So those are the patients that I'm particularly concerned about when I think about this new mpox strain.”
Main Takeaways
- Individuals with advanced HIV or weakened immune systems are at a higher risk of severe illness and death from mpox, particularly with more severe strains like clade I.
- The Jynneos vaccine is crucial for preventing mpox in immunocompromised individuals, but commercialization could limit access for the uninsured or underinsured.
- Overcoming HIV-related stigma and ensuring effective patient-provider communication are vital for improving care and access to necessary resources for managing both HIV and mpox.
Mpox is caused by different strains, each with varying levels of severity and transmission. Clade I is associated with more severe disease and higher fatality rates compared to clade II. As a result, clade I necessitates more extensive public health measures, such as widespread vaccination and strict isolation, particularly for vulnerable populations like those with advanced HIV. Clade II generally leads to milder disease, lower fatality rates, and less transmission, which allows for more targeted public health responses, including surveillance and localized containment.2
Moore comments, “The potential for clade I to spread to the United States increases the risk for those who have uncontrolled HIV.” Understanding these differences is important for effective resource allocation and response strategies.
Our discussion also touched on the commercialization of the Jynneos vaccine and its impact on vaccine accessibility. According to the CDC’s updated mpox guidance, Jynneos is recommended for immunocompromised individuals, including those with HIV or primary immunodeficiency.
Moore raises concerns about the commercialization of vaccines, particularly following the period of federal government provision at no cost. “It decreases availability for those who are uninsured or underinsured. I'm particularly concerned about that in states where Medicaid has not been expanded because we know that patients without Medicaid or other health insurance are unlikely to access the medication. It’s going to be much more difficult for them to find it for free or on a sliding scale,” he said.