|Articles|June 24, 2020

Advanced RSV Vaccine Candidate Shows Promise in Young Children

RSV-associated lower respiratory infections affect tens of millions of children and kill more than 100,000 children each year. A new vaccine candidate is showing promise in protecting against the disease.

Investigators have created a promising vaccine candidate for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) that leverages new knowledge of the virus’ genetics to create a vaccine that is both attenuated and immunogenic.

In a study published in the Journal of Infectious Diseases, the authors noted the findings will require further follow-up, but could eventually lead to a major reduction in the number of RSV cases globally.

RSV is estimated to have led to 33 million cases of lower respiratory infection in infants and young children in the year 2015. Approximately 118,000 children under the age of 5 died from those infections that year. The virus hits early, often affecting children in the first few months of life. In the US, 57,000 cases of RSV are reported each year.

Despite decades of research, there is still no vaccine for RSV. However, corresponding author Ruth A. Karron, MD, of the Center for Immunization Research, at Johns Hopkins University, and colleagues, reported that new advances in elucidation of RSV gene function have made it possible for scientists to reverse-genetically engineer rationally designed attenuated RSV strains. Using that knowledge, the team worked to develop a vaccine that can be administered intranasally.

The vaccine candidate, known as RSV/ΔNS2/Δ1313/I1314L, is made with two key changes. First, the authors deleted the NS2 gene.

“NS2 is a virally encoded type I and III interferon antagonist that interferes with interferon induction and signaling,” Karron and colleagues wrote. “Deletion of the NS2 gene diminished RSV replication in chimpanzees.”

In addition, the team deleted codon 1313 in the polymerase (L) gene, which they say confers mild temperature sensitivity. The resulting virus was attenuated and shown to be immunogenic in nonhuman primates.

The next step was to see how it performed in humans. The investigators created a double-blind, placebo-controlled study to test the vaccine candidate. Fifteen RSV seropositive children were given the vaccine intranasally at a dose of 106 plaque-forming units (PFU). Meanwhile, 21 RSV seronegative children were given a dose of 105 PFUs, and 30 seronegative children were given a dose of 106 PFUs. The vaccine-to-placebo ratio was 2:1.

The investigators found that the 105 dose was over-attenuated, but the 106 dose replicated in 90% of children who received the vaccine and was found to be immunogenic and well-tolerated in those enrollees.

When investigators followed up following RSV season, they found that 9 of the 20 children who received the vaccine had significantly greater increases in RSV titers compared to 8 of the 10 placebo recipients.

After the second RSV season, the authors noted that one patient experienced mild RSV-associated LRI.

“Although an isolated event, this information suggests that it may be desirable to offer a booster dose of RSV/ΔNS2/Δ1313/I1314L to protect during a second RSV season,” Karron and colleagues noted.

Such questions will need to be examined in further vaccine trials, they add.

In a commentary accompanying the study, Octavio Ramilo, MD, of the Ohio State University College of Medicine, said the findings are very encouraging. He and colleagues noted that advances in understanding the pathogenesis of RSV have led to potential new strategies that could protect infants in the first few months of life. However he said the 6-month-and-older age cohort remains a large population in need.

“A live attenuated vaccine offers an attractive strategy to protect this population, emphasizing the importance of the results reported by Karron et al [4] for the RSV/ΔNS2/Δ1313/I1314L vaccine,” he concluded.


Related to this article

How The Food Safety Surveillance Infrastructure Works in the US
In the first episode of our news series looking at the food safety network, Lynette Johnston, PhD, offers insights into how the federal government surveillance infrastructure operates, and how epidemiologists serve as food detectives in determining bacterial pathogens and potential foodborne outbreaks.
Ebola and the Ongoing Tale of US Failures
In mid-May, as the world was still grappling with an unexpected hantavirus outbreak aboard a tourism vessel, news broke of an Ebola outbreak in the Ituri Province of the Democratic Republic of the Congo spanning at least 3 health zones, including Bunia, Rwampara, and Mongbwalu.
This Week's Top 5 Infectious Disease News Stories: September 12-September 18, 2026
In this week's top infectious disease stories, a Pennsylvania teen became the state's fourth measles death in weeks, the CDC reported a 17% summer surge in rabies exposure calls, new research revisited whether cefepime raises mortality risk, a multihospital review examined ceftriaxone's safety after state alerts, and examining Legionella pneumonia diagnostics.
Measles Update: September 18, 2026
The latest CDC numbers show a 5.37% increase of measles cases from week-to-week. In Pennsylvania, the fourth measles-related death was reported in 2026. Additionally, the CDC has made a change in the way it will report deaths.
CDC Responds to Surge in Rabies Exposures
A "Clinician Outreach" from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in April anticipated an increase in rabies exposures, and the striking surge in case reports this summer prompted a recent health advisory alert from the federal agency.
New Diagnositics for Legionella Pneumonia May Streamline Care Continuum
Reported cases of Legionnaires’ disease have been on the rise for the past decade, and identifying Legionella bacteria requires specialized testing in the microbiology lab. Here is a clinical overview of Legionella bacteria, including required testing, treatment, and reporting to public health officials.
Ceftriaxone Safety: Separating Signal From Risk
A retrospective multihospital study found that severe adverse events occurred at similarly low rates with ceftriaxone and other IV cephalosporins suggesting there is no evidence to support avoiding ceftriaxone despite recent health department safety alerts.